![]() ![]() Some of these external links are older (from when VMware Player wouldn't let you create VMs, for example), and I'm not sure how much has changed since then or what strides both apps have made:Ī recurring theme is the bloat and (lack of) speed associated with VMware Player, though I didn't notice anything particularly lethargic in my (brief) testing. Don’t pay for products you aren’t using or restrict your software choices. KVM has: Lower total cost of ownership, freeing up operating budget to explore modern, innovative technologies. Doing some brief research, many people actually appeared to prefer VirtualBox. Choosing a virtualization option based on KVM has many advantages over other solutions, like VMware vSphere. I had the feeling that VMware was the preferred solution here at, but now I'm not so sure. VirtualBox has worked well for that, but if it doesn't offer any advantages over VMware Player at this point in time then I'll just go with the latter for its more robust 3D support. I want a straighforward VM app that will allow me to play around with older versions of Windows, various Linux distros, etc. I installed it on my second rig and so far have been pleased with the results, though work and school have prevented me from doing a rigorous comparison.īasically, my needs are very simple. While both met my needs, I see that VMware Player now lets you create virtual machines as well as run them. When running a VM in years past, I've typically gone with MS Virtual XP (pre-Windows 7) or VirtualBox. ![]() I would have thought this subject would have been rehashed dozens of times, but surprisingly a search didn't produce the amount of info I was looking for, or the results were primarily discussing virtualization in an enterprise environment. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |